An Epistemic Logic for Arbitration (Extended Abstract)
نویسنده
چکیده
Arbitration is the process of settling a conflict between two or more persons[Liberatore and Schaerf, 1995; Revesz, 1993; 1997]. The first version of the arbitration operator between knowledge bases is proposed in [Revesz, 1993] via the socalled model-fitting operators. The postulates for modelfitting operators and the corresponding semantic characterization are presented. Arbitration is defined as a special kind of model-fitting operators. In [Revesz, 1997], the arbitration operator is further generalized to make it applicable to weighted knowledge bases. A set of postulates is also directly used in characterizing the arbitration between a weighted knowledge base and a regular knowledge base. A weighted knowledge base in [Revesz, 1997] is defined as a mapping from model sets to nonnegative real numbers and a regular knowledge base is just a finite set of prepositional sentences. A generalized loyal assignment is then defined as a function that assigns to each weighted knowledge base a pre-order between prepositional sentences so that some conditions are satisfied for the pre-orders. Finally, the arbitration of a weighted knowledge base by a regular knowledge base is defined as
منابع مشابه
Belief Fusion and Revision: An Overview Based on Epistemic Logic Semantics
In this paper, we formulate some approaches to belief fusion and revision using epistemic logic semantics. Fusion operators considered in this paper are majority merging, arbitration, and general merging. Some modalities corresponding to belief fusion and revision operators are incorporated into epistemic logics. The Kripke semantics of these extended logics are presented. While most existing a...
متن کاملEpistemic Logics for Information Fusion
In this paper, we propose some extensions of epistemic logic for reasoning about information fusion. The fusion operators considered in this paper include majority merging, arbitration, and general merging. Some modalities corresponding to these fusion operators are added to epistemic logics and the Kripke semantics of these extended logics are presented. While most existing approaches treat in...
متن کاملAn Epistemic Strategy Logic (Extended Abstract)
The paper presents an extension of temporal epistemic logic with operators that quantify over strategies. The language also provides a natural way to represent what agents would know were they to be aware of the strategies being used by other agents. Some examples are presented to motivate the framework, and relationships to several variants of alternating temporal epistemic logic are discussed...
متن کاملOptimizing Epistemic Model Checking Using Conditional Independence (Extended Abstract)
This paper shows that conditional independence reasoning can be applied to optimize epistemic model checking, in which one verifies that a model for a number of agents operating with imperfect information satisfies a formula expressed in a modal multi-agent logic of knowledge. The optimization has been implemented in the epistemic model checker MCK. The paper reports experimental results demons...
متن کاملTogether We Know How to Achieve: An Epistemic Logic of Know-How (Extended Abstract)
The existence of a coalition strategy to achieve a goal does not necessarily mean that the coalition has enough information to know how to follow the strategy. Neither does it mean that the coalition knows that such a strategy exists. The paper studies an interplay between the distributed knowledge, coalition strategies, and coalition “know-how” strategies. The main technical result is a sound ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003